Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The ECLT was examined on both samples with a photographic follow up.
Specificity was high in both samples, with a small decrease as lookback period increased.
Mean expression ratios were submitted to a one-sample Student's t-test against the baseline value of one (equal gene expression in both samples) with a multiple testing correction (Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate) [ 47].
Similar(57)
In other cases, the log of the RPKM fold-change for each gene between the two samples was assessed for the major genes (genes expressed in both samples, with an RPKM higher than a threshold value in at least one sample).
Students in both samples with entrepreneurial family background and/or a positive view (success) of their family's business experience expressed a higher intention to start own business.
To further confirm and investigate the size of the CNV region, we subjected both samples with SDHC somatic duplication to a genome-wide SNP-array analysis.
Of these, 7391 individuals appeared in both analytic samples, with a further 143 featured in the BMI sample only and 33 in the percentage body fat sample only, making a total of 7567 individuals featuring in one or both analytic samples.
BAG1 exhibits a fold change of 1.66 with PCR Arrays but a fold change of -2.89 with AFX while the other platforms indicate the gene to be similarly expressed in both RNA samples with a minimal fold change from -1.97 to 1.85.
The aim of this work is to quantify the texture; thus, illite and smectite are treated as a single mixed layer phase in both samples (I/S), with a 1 1 ratio (50%% illite, 50%% smectite).
The genome-wide distribution of peaks was similar to what have been seen in the HepG2 cell line [ 7] with a marked enrichment for peaks immediately upstream of the TSS for both samples but with a better enrichment obtained for the patient sample.
For both assays, samples with an S/P ratio above 0.4 were considered positive for PRRSV-specific IgG antibodies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com