Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Most of the mitochondrial P or T-types correspond to the morphological and/or chronological assignment to either the primigenius population or the taurus population, except two: ALB3 was labelled as "determination insecure" and SVO3 was described as "small"; but bone fragments of both samples were not measurable.
Similar(59)
It was the result of a faster laboratory technique (23.7 ± 15.5 vs. 31.6 ± 20.2 min; p = 0.03), whereas the transport time of both samples was not different.
However, the difference in the charge transfer resistance of both samples is not that significant, suggesting the OER activity of the catalysts appears to be more affected by ECSA than the charge transfer resistance, and therefore resulting in the higher OER activity of SW Ni Ni3S2/NF.
Information on some of the transcripts that were detected in both samples was not available from the UCSC browser due to the records being suppressed.
In a complementary analysis, the distribution of districts in both samples was not different (P=0.22, data not shown).
In essence, both microarray and TMM normalization assume that the majority of genes, common to both samples, are not differentially expressed.
On SDS-PAGE, the intensity of full-size ELP bands in both samples was not drastically different from the blank comparison, and there were no signs of degradation (Fig. 7).
The data set has about 997 RT-PCR data for validation of RNA-seq analysis results [ 35], and the genes with mean reads number fewer than 5 in both samples are not considered.
In contrast to commercial rice flour having less particle size (65.3 μm), the particle sizes (171.1 171.9 μm) of both the samples were not significantly different.
However, Cr2O3 coated on both untreated and pre-oxidized samples were not effective barrier coatings.
In total, 93 samples were culture-positive by both MODS and LJ, 154 samples were not positive by either, and MODS and LJ results differed for 17 samples concordance by this measure = 100 × (93 + 154 / 93 + 154 + 17) = 93.6% (kappa 0.86).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com