Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
However, when both samples were evaluated using confocal fluorescence microscopy after incubation with furfuryl alcohol, dramatic differences become apparent.
To estimate the two-sample FIT test characteristics the following approach was applied; we used the average positivity rates and detection rates of the first and second test performed from the two-sample FIT group as reference and calculated the relative difference in performance when both samples were evaluated.
Similar(58)
The efficiency of removal of rRNAs from the total starting RNA in both samples was evaluated with the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer using the specific chip for RNA.
Surviving features found in both samples are evaluated such that where x i is the C/C mixing ratio of the ith sample, r i is intensity ratio (I12C/ I13C) of the ith sample, and e (ratio_tol) sets the acceptable tolerance for the intensity ratio relative to the mixing ratio.
For both analyses, all samples were evaluated including the individual particle sizes of the separate anatomical fractions for all 3 species (36 samples in total).
Aligned reads from both tumor and normal samples were evaluated for somatic events including non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNVs), indels, copy number variants (CNVs) and translocations.
Motility, morphology, plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal status, and in vitro fertilizing capacity of both fresh CT and EP samples were evaluated.
Following synthesis and purification, the biotin-labeled samples were evaluated by both 260/280 absorbance spectrophotometry and capillary electrophoresis.
In a study conducted by Regitnig and coworkers [ 17] there was a 48% rate of discordance between primary and metastatic tumor when 31 paired samples were evaluated by both IHC and FISH.
All honey samples were evaluated for both total (acidity, osmolarity, hydrogen peroxide and non-peroxide activity) and plant derived non-peroxide antibacterial activity by agar well diffusion assay at 50%and25%5% dilution in sterile distilled water and 25% in catalase solution.
All samples were evaluated in quadruplicate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com