Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
The 10 age levels investigated in both samples were compared.
When both samples were compared we used the combined sample (N = 1,803).
Descriptive statistics for the sociodemographic measures and weight status of both samples were compared using independent t-tests and chi-square tests.
The distributions of the proteins in the gel slices in both samples were compared to verify shifts in the gel position that could be accounted for by ubiquitylation.
Similar(56)
The expression level of each transcript in both samples was compared with its expression in the skin of age-matched wild-type mice not treated with DMBA/TPA.
Baseline tumour and plasma 1 EGFR mutation status in patients evaluable for both samples was compared by cross-tabulation of the adjusted mutation status and mutation subtype from tumour at baseline vs the mutation status from plasma 1 at baseline.
Urea and creatinine levels in pre- and post-dialysis in both immediate and stored samples were compared using paired T-tests.
Samples were compared using the comparative Ct method.
When the latter 33% of UCB units that formed ECFC in both fresh and frozen UCB samples were compared, the ECFC recovery from cryopreservation was ~50% lower than that found in the original fresh UCB sample (Fig. 4b).
In the present study all samples were compared with both Indian and WHO-recommended limit for NO3 in the drinking water.
The optical setup was adjusted to the best signal-to-noise ratio and fixed when different samples were compared in both CLSM and FLIM modes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com