Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Second-order quadratic models for both responses were significant (P<0.05; adjusted R2 =99.72% and 99.95% for biomass and biosurfactant concentrations respectively) when data-fitting was attempted.
Similar(59)
Those two justices' responses were significant because both were part of the 5-to-4 majority in the Blakely decision and have been seen by some court-watchers as the most likely of the five to try to draw a boundary between that case and the federal guidelines.
Models developed for all responses were significant (p ≤ 0.01) without significant lack of fit.
The responses were significant (p < 0.05) and fitted well with the quadratic model.
Amplitudes of all analyzed responses were significant in comparison to a 1 s prestimulus baseline (dependent samples t-tests; p < 0.01 for all comparisons).
Validity was much lower and yielded a κ statistic of only 0.08 and no responses were significant.
The dose responses were significant at Days 14 and 42 (p values 0.0003, 0.0008, respectively).
Responses were significant in the IF and IR lines.
All possible responses were significant when compared to the reference category 'Strongly disagree'.
The differences between responses were significant (i.e., intervention x bed rest interactions; all P < 0.05).
(Table 2) None of the correlation coefficients between students' and staff's responses were significant for any of the characteristics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com