The main conclusion of the authors was that all three antennal types were found in each of the three response types, suggesting that a male's behavioral response in the flight tunnel was independent of whether he carried an E-type, I-type, or Z-type antenna [ 13].
These functions are encoded by genes of all four-memory response types, suggesting that after providing an up/down transcriptional response in S1, a large number of Arabidopsis genes alter their transcript outputs (further up- or down-regulating or reversing towards pre-stressed levels) in a subsequent exposure to more finely modify cell membrane structure, ion balance and homeostasis.
This, together with a lack of correlation between the two mismatch response types, suggests that the LDN provides different information about the processing of the auditory input.
The striking differences between these two response types suggests that fundamentally different mechanisms of cortical processing are activated during the SV and PB conditions at these brain sites, as opposed to a graded modulation of the same activation process.
These reports suggested that both response types (evoked and spontaneous) can be modelled as product of a linear time-invariant system (i.e. with time-invariant kernels or response functions).
The coefficient of sensitivity in this study was less than 1 for a variety of land use types, suggesting validity of the response of ESV to land use change and planning.
The authors found no significant difference in SC activity between the three movement types, suggesting that the common mechanism that serves both eye- and head-movements does not result in a summation of effects regarding the collicular BOLD response.
The experience of BRAF inhibition in other tumor types suggests that response is unlikely to be uniform across all CNS tumors, even in the presence of similar V600 mutations.
In ABA-induced stomatal closure assays ABA sensitivity of ABAleon2.1 lines was comparable to Col-0 wild type responses, suggesting potential tissue or cell specific effects of ABAleon2.1 on ABA responses, which may be linked to a higher basal ABA concentration in these cells.
In the ROI analyses, significant correlations between P50 ratios and the activation in the single trial type suggests that the response to the first (conditioning) stimulus (in hippocampus, thalamus, STG, and the left frontal gyrus) determines the P50 amplitude to the second stimulus and thereby the P50 ratio.
