Sentence examples for both renal function and from inspiring English sources

This distinction remained true when corrected for both renal function and SLE disease severity.

Renal impairment and diabetes are notable thus current guidance recommends that patients have a record of both renal function and serum glucose after diagnosis [ 3].

This, combined with the associated concomitant medication use, which impacts both renal function and uric acid [ 36], may further increase hyperuricemia.

Further investigation is required to determine a correlation between platelet reactivity and both renal function and the high mortality risk of patients with chronic kidney disease.

The findings of the study confirmed that both renal function and interstitial damage at biopsy were predictive factors for prognosis of survival, but mesangial expansion was not [ 18].

Although there are no data available on the presence of VUR in the Freedman et al study, it is conceivable that gene(s) in this region may contribute to both renal function and anatomy.

Further validation of this protein panel is needed in other populations to verify their predictive ability for the development of both renal function decline and urinary albumin and to determine whether these could be used as biomarkers of disease progression and response to treatment.

These aged females lose their advantage both in renal function and in tubular cell death.

As both reduced renal function and elevated urinary albumin or protein are independently associated with adverse kidney outcomes (end-stage renal disease, AKI and progression of CKD) 1 as well as cardiovascular events in the general population, monitoring may be warranted.

Table 3 shows that patients with both worsening renal function and poor diuretic response (less than the median response) had the worst 60- and 180-day outcomes, but the risks were not more or less than the combined individual effects would predict (interaction P-values 0.72 and 0.53 for 60- and 180-day outcomes, respectively).

This study adds evidence to the recent study from Nejat and colleagues that these classifications based on clinical presumption may be erroneous, with increased serum levels of both biomarkers of renal function and injury in these subsets of patients [ 5].