As Hammersley and Traianou [ 18] pointed out, there are a range of perspectives in relation to ethical review; here we outline a framework for comparing two very different 'ideal type' paradigms of, and approaches to, ethics in social research in relation to both the processes of knowledge production and methodology.
We now know that transparency in the processes of knowledge exchange, allied with fairness in the rules of engagement, are required for scientists to work with policy makers and relevant publics in meaningful ways.
We introduce the dynamic knowledge loop as a method to analyze processes of knowledge generation, knowledge exchange, and social learning.
The empirical results were analyzed with regard to processes of knowledge integration, knowledge generation, knowledge exchange, and social learning.
This paper presents the knowledge engineering processes of knowledge acquisition, conceptual design, and system implementation.
In the first part, theoretical considerations about processes of knowledge exchange, knowledge generation, adaptive capacity, and social learning are presented.
The "dynamic knowledge loop" explores processes of knowledge generation, knowledge exchange, and social learning in inter- and transdisciplinary cooperation and relates them to adaptive capacity.
In a second part, we shall describe the processes of knowledge determination and modelling.
Therefore, they concluded that problem-solving competence was distinct from intelligence, although it determines processes of knowledge acquisition.
The processes of knowledge acquisition, conversion, and application form a perspective for a framework of knowledge integration within an organization (Gold et al. 2001).
