Sentence examples for both probe sets in from inspiring English sources

To achieve this, we used an ANOVA model (described in Methods) to examine some redundant probe set pairs for which both probe sets in the pair received a MAS5 "Present" call.

These results suggest that even if one or both probe sets in a redundant pair do not suggest differential expression in isolation, together they may indicate a condition-dependent change in the relative concentrations of individual probe set target transcripts.

We limited our analysis only to cases in which both probe sets in a pair have the same suffix.

Sequence homology between probe sets was determined by counting the number of identical probes shared by both probe sets in a pair.

Our decision to include in the analysis only cases were both probe sets in a pair are informative was based on the observation that the transcription values reported by non informative probe sets frequently reflect random noise fluctuations and thus the meaning of the correlation between those values and transcription values from informative probes is not clear.

The HR probe sets in groups 1 3 were further divided into several subgroups based on different expression patterns.

We have now included the temperature dependent closure experiment and note that both probe sets are comparable in matching experiments.

Members of the cellulose synthase A (CesA) gene family showed two different expression profiles demonstrating involvement into secondary cell wall (Ghi.6061) and primary cell wall (Ghi.2620) biosynthesis with transcripts corresponding to both probe sets down-regulated in Li 2 mutant fibers.

For instance, there are two probe sets for adenylate isopentenyltransferases (cytokinin synthases, Mtr.31420.1.S1_at & Mtr.12113.1.S1_at) in the array and both probe sets did not expressed in both cultures.

Calculating the correlation of the group of pairs in which only one of the probe sets was informative revealed that in all data sets the average correlation of this group of pairs was much closer to the average correlation between random pairs than to the average correlation of the pairs in which both probe sets were informative [see additional file 3].

Thresholds chosen for WT vs. mutant analyses were 1.5-fold minimum change between WT and KO and difference ≥50, and probe sets in both Picciotto and Xu mutants had to differ from WT in the same direction (i.e., either overexpressed in WT or overexpressed in both mutants).