Sentence examples for both premises were from inspiring English sources
Henry's home and both premises were deluged, and by the time he realised the scale of the disaster, it was too late to evacuate.
In the cases where both premises were translated as equations of the form ay = 0, the elimination conclusion turned out to be 0 = 0, even though Aristotelian logic might demand a non-trivial conclusion.
Both premises are fallacious: we should not have weapons which cannot be used for our defence and we cannot influence other countries not to have nuclear weapons when we ourselves have them.
And, when some valid syllogisms are formulated according to Aristotelian rules, paradoxes arise in which both premises are true and the conclusion is false.
It seems that there is no interpretation of 'possibility of motivation' for which it is plausible that both premises are true and avoid begging the question against externalism.
Finally, the premise subset {q, r} is "in between": together q and r are relevant (if both premises are left out, the conclusion is no longer derivable), but each of them separately can be left out (while keeping the conclusion derivable).
The fact that theists can enlist such unlikely allies does not mean the moral argument for God's existence is sound, but it does suggest that the argument is not obviously question-begging, since both premises are sometimes accepted by (different) non-believers.
