Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The proliferation rate of both populations was evaluated using a cell DNA assay.
Similar(59)
Both populations were evaluated for leaf hairiness at the tillering stage.
Hybrid collections derived from segregating F3 4 lines from both populations were evaluated together with hybrids obtained from their parental lines (repeated 9 times) as well as 2 common checks in field traits using an incomplete 24 × 10 alpha design with two replications.
Goodness of fit to a Mendelian 1 : 1 segregation ratio in both RIL populations was evaluated by Chi-square tests at a 5% significance level.
Multiplex detection using mixed bacteria populations was evaluated and accurate detection was obtained.
The percentage of cells in different marker populations was evaluated using BD FACSDiva software.
Specific lysis of HIV-infected MDDC populations was evaluated by combining caspase detection with MDDC infection by an HIV-1/GFP virus.
Heterogeneity among the study populations was evaluated by the I statistic [ 35].
The association between sampling time and differences in genotype frequency among populations was evaluated using simple linear correlation.
Accuracy of genomic predictions across populations was evaluated by cross-validation, which involved training on one population and validating on another population.
In cycles 6, 7 and 8, 50 individuals from both high and low populations were evaluated in order to make selections.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com