both parties

USAGE SUMMARY

"both parties" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to refer to two people, groups, or organizations that are involved in the same matter or transaction. For example: "Both parties agreed to the terms of the contract."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Colleagues defended both parties.

The New York Times

Both parties accepted.

The New York Times

Both parties employ thugs.

The Economist

Both parties are wrong.

The Economist

"With both parties!

The New York Times

That worries both parties.

The Economist

Both parties have won".

The New York Times

Both parties are invitation only.

The New York Times

And both parties know it.

The New Yorker

The proposal suited both parties.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"Both parties are happy.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "both parties", ensure it's clear who or what the parties are to avoid ambiguity. For example, "Both parties, the buyer and the seller, agreed to the terms."

Common error

Avoid using "both parties" without specifying who the parties are. This can lead to confusion and weaken your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "both parties" typically functions as a subject or object in a sentence. It identifies the actors involved in an action, agreement, or situation. As Ludwig AI underlines, "both parties" is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

86%

Academia

7%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "both parties" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term, as verified by Ludwig AI. It serves to denote two distinct entities involved in a given scenario, finding common usage in news, academic, and formal contexts. For optimal clarity, specifying the entities involved is crucial, and in scenarios demanding nuanced expression, alternatives like "both sides" or "the two participants" can offer added precision. The pervasiveness of "both parties" across authoritative sources solidifies its status as a reliable and versatile element in written communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

both sides

Emphasizes the opposing or distinct nature of the two groups or individuals.

the two sides

Similar to "both sides", highlighting the duality and potential opposition.

the two entities

A more formal way to refer to two distinct organizations or individuals.

the two participants

Focuses on the involvement of two actors in a specific event or agreement.

either party

Emphasizes the individual perspective and rights of each side involved.

all stakeholders

Expands the scope to include all individuals or groups affected by a decision.

the involved parties

Highlights that more than two entities are implicated in the matter.

all sides involved

Emphasizes the inclusion of multiple perspectives and interests.

each faction

Highlights the separate and potentially conflicting nature of the groups.

the opposing camps

Focuses on the adversarial relationship between the two groups.

FAQs

How can I use "both parties" in a sentence?

"Both parties" is used to indicate that two distinct groups or individuals are involved in an action or agreement. For example, "Both parties agreed to the terms of the contract".

What's the difference between "both parties" and "each party"?

"Both parties" refers to two entities collectively, while "each party" refers to them individually. Using "each party" emphasizes the separate actions or rights of each entity.

What can I say instead of "both parties"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "both sides", "the two participants", or "the involved parties".

Is it always necessary to specify who "both parties" are?

Yes, for clarity, it's best to specify who "both parties" are, especially if it's not immediately obvious from the context. This avoids ambiguity and ensures the reader understands who is being referred to.