Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
This pattern holds for both outcome variables.
Additionally, exclusively expressed transcripts were identified for both outcome groups.
Figure 4 graphically represents the match between both outcome variables for all test implants.
As a consequence, the subspaces for both outcome classes are similar to each other.
The first two instruments are both outcome measures but it is worth noting that the focus of each instrument is slightly different.
A marked reduction was observed in both outcome measures was observed already during the first month and tended to improve over the following months.
In total, 44 (57%) patients received NMB during the period of TTM, with no difference in the NMB dosage between both outcome groups (p = 0.804; Table 2).
We re-estimate the same models as before for both outcome variables but now include the locus of control as an additional control.
The goal of this subsection is to assess the robustness of our results to the inclusion of an additional control for both outcome variables.
Both outcome variables (number of papers and citations) are count variables.
Additionally, the model was adjusted for potential confounders affecting both outcome and weight.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com