Sentence examples for both of these methods are from inspiring English sources

The equations for both of these methods are outlined.

However, both of these methods are hardly applicable in a clinical setting.

Limited available data suggested both of these methods are effective beyond that time.

In many cases, both of these methods are well developed and selectively exploited depending on the specific target of the study.

Both of these methods are characterized by sequential administration of dual tracers of 15O2 and C15O2 typically with a 3-min interval during a single PET scan.

Both of these methods are simple and well established, but the Bligh and Dryer (1959) method can analyse microalgae biomass directly without pre-drying treatment.

The predictions of both these methods are significantly better than random (p < 0.01 or less in all cases using tail probability in a hypergeometric distribution) and clearly outperform the maximum likelihood baseline and the Inferelator.

Both of these methods were based on concept of Total time on test, TTT plots.

The intent of using both of these methods was not to seek confirmation and alignment but rather to expand and present complementary findings and more in-depth insights.

However, both of these methods were not recommended since they would reduce the ductility of the beam, as opposed to the primary objective of the proposed design.

Use of bootstrap samples results in both of these methods being essentially not an individual machine learning optimizer, but an ensemble learner conducting voting between large number of individual models.