Sentence examples for both of these explanations from inspiring English sources

Well, Levenson rejects both of these explanations.

Both of these explanations are valid and important.

The crucial point about both of these explanations is that they stand Mr. Christie's narrative about himself on its head.

While both of these explanations are entirely plausible, you may be missing the signs of a transient ischemic attack (TIA) if you jump to conclusions too quickly.

Both of these explanations could, at least in the early stages, be considered consistent with the data.

We suggest that careful enquiry observes a higher prevalence of migraine by capturing milder cases (ie, by better case ascertainment), and that, although both of these explanations may contribute in part, migraine is indeed more prevalent than past estimates have suggested.

We discuss both of these potential explanations in more detail below.

Both of these mechanistic explanations are supported by the enrichment of specific functional classes of candidate genes (see above).

Notwithstanding the difference in their way of interpretation, both of these alternative explanations were made on the basis of previous phylogenetic assertion that Monogenea and Cestoda are most closely related ('Cercomeromorphae') and that the Trematoda is sister to the Monogenea+Cestoda.

However, it is not possible to confirm the relevance of these explanations since both increased and decreased susceptibility to LTD induction have been found in the same strain and/or for the same Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio (for a comparison of these studies see [15], [17], [18], [20].

None of these explanations are true.