Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(16)
That there's something a little undignified about the bare-all nature of both of these articles goes without saying.
The points made in both of these articles are eloquently put and there no obvious holes to be found in the arguments' logic.
The full texts of both of these articles underwent critical appraisal [39, 40], and the studies resulted of good quality, even if based on small populations (40 enrolled in Muren et al.'s study and 53 in Nau et al.'s study).
Both of these articles accused the other man of publishing results based on those of the author.
Both of these articles about the study play to, and propagate, the popular fantasy that when the right magical formula comes along, weight loss can be uncoupled from calories.
Both of these articles led me to reflect on this next graph -- one I've posted before showing the growth in productivity -- output per hour of work -- and employment, with both series from the private sector.
Similar(44)
Performing community detection on the corresponding network, we compare the results with an expert made classification of these articles, considering both similarities and discrepancies between the two different partitions.
Description of these articles.
Some of these articles were controversial.
The quality of these articles varied.
Few of these articles provide empirical data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com