Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Goodness of fit indices for both models were within optimal parameters [ 35].
Similar(59)
The limit values of the design space of the inputs and outputs obtained by both models were found to be within the knowledge space.
All coefficients in the imputed models were within 10%% of the values in the limited models (data not shown).
Improvements of c-statistics, however, were relatively small and c-statistics of the enhanced models were within 95% confidence intervals of the original Charlson models (Table 3).
The SAVES results (Table 4(a)) of all models were within the cut-off range suggesting the reliability of our proposed models.
Multiple best-fit models were within the predetermined threshold criteria of ΔAICc ≤2 of the top model and weights greater than 1.5% (Additional file 4: Table S2).
Additionally, parameter estimates of the slope and intercept for both linear models are within one standard error of each other.
However, the applicability of both models is restricted to temperatures within the range of values that have a linear effect on development [23], whereas temperatures experienced in natural nests and used in this study include values above and below this optimal temperature range (OTR) [8], [12], [26], [27], [28].
As such, a commonality found within both models is the destabilization of the nuclear lamina.
The porosity of both models is different in different layers but within the layer it remains constant; the porosity distribution is shown in Fig. 9.
We also found that the relationships for individual models are within one standard deviation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com