Sentence examples for both models were significant from inspiring English sources

ANOVA results showed that both models were significant, expressing ideal relationships between all independent and dependent variables.

The large F value (45.56 for PPAP and 89.11 for ATOP) and very low P value (<0.0001 for both PPAP and ATOP) suggested that both models were significant at high confidence level.

Both models were significant (ps < 0.001).

The top-performing unadjusted model slightly outperformed the corresponding adjusted model; however, the difference in model testing balanced accuracy was small and both models were significant.

Although both models were significant, the predictors explained more variance in the automatic functions compared to the social functions, indicating that the predicting variables included in the model are meaningful constructs in relationship to the automatic functions of NSSI.

Cervical incompetence was excluded from the prediction of the CS rate in model 2. Both the likelihood ratio and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were significant in models 1 and 2, at p < 0.0001, indicating that while the risk factors considered in both models were significant, in terms of predicting the probability of a CS, the fit was nevertheless imperfect.

Although both models are significant, determinants of visiting a physical therapist mostly show weak relations (p < 0.10, Table 5).

The Model F Values of 43.49 for the glucose model and 25.41 for the xylose model imply that both models are significant.

The Pearson correlation for both models is significant but weak with the LINfs3 model showing a slightly higher correlation (0.41, p=0.0001) than the LINiter model (0.34, p=0.0022).

The difference in the explanatory power of both models was significant for 'exhaustion' (p<0.001), and for 'cynicism' (p<0.001) and 'efficacy (p<0.001).

Both regression models were significant: model statistics for moderate-intensity activity recall were: F = 76.60, R 2  = 0.26, p < 0.0001 and for vigorous-intensity activity recall were: F = 34.35, R 2  = 0.14, p < 0.0001.