Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
In both models, it is required to estimate the enthalpies of each component.
In both models, it is also necessary for researchers to account for any methodological challenges that might impair their estimation, including multicollinearity, autocorrelation, and heteroscedasticity.
With both models it is possible to describe and explain the chemical and physical processes during storage and regeneration, including the effect of incomplete regeneration.
Comparing the R 2 values derived from both models, it is found that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model fits better with the kinetic data of c-MCM-41(40) than the pseudo-first-order kinetic model.
This maximum acceleration can be verified by experimental studies, however, since the objective of this study is to make a relative comparison between the intact and the ASR affected concrete, and this coefficient is constant for both models, it is believed that the exact value of accelerations do not hinder such a comparison.
Considering only those regions that are well-conserved and similarly structured by both models, it is expected that in one third of the protein (mostly in the alpha helix) mutations could be evaluated accurately.
Similar(50)
For both models it was checked whether the inclusion of work-status had a significant influence.
For both models it was assumed that covariance structure for time was a first order Autoregressive Model AR(1).
When crosschecking the significant variables from both models, it was found that both risk factors identified by the forward-entry BRT model were significantly associated with disease occurrence when analyzed using the multivariate logistic multiple regression, but yielded a lower AUC than the variable selected directly by the multivariate logistic regression.
And while both have French models, it is Anthony Powell and Evelyn Waugh who are Boyd's true ancestors.
Unfortunately, unless studies have been performed in both humans and animal models it is not possible to evaluate the equivalency.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com