The major difference between the AR and initial additive models can be observed in Figure 3B and E. Within these models, the effect of proximity to the two major roadways on UFPs was similar, because both models indicated an approximate 15% decrease in concentrations within the first 100 m, with similarly shaped curves for both roadways.
The horizontal displacements for GPS stations along the east coast, near the dilatometer sites, are also similar for both models, indicating a global NW motion (stations KNKO, NHSI, or PING).
Both models indicate a therapeutic effect of AhR activation in autoimmunity development in adult animals.
Significant positive relationships between estimated NPP versus field data were found for both models, indicating a general applicability of both models, as shown earlier for MOD17 [ 54, 55] and LPJ-GUESS [ 56, 57].
Both effect models indicated a significantly lower incidence with ibandronate than with placebo (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96, p=0.003, fixed effects; I=58%).
Both models indicated that a higher number of prescribers before and during pregnancy, a higher number of visits to the physician before pregnancy, and having a diagnosis of depression before or during pregnancy increased the probability of using antidepressants on the first day and on the last day of gestation.
Examination of generalised additive model plots for continuous variables significantly associated with altered risk of colic in both models indicated that a linear fit was appropriate for each.
The analysis of the equilibrium experimental data by both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models indicated a positive adsorption.
In model 3, the finding from both models indicated that the district with a higher proportion of literate women, percentage of women with 3+ ANC, and percentage of women who had safe delivery was negatively associated with IMR.
When using OSP as an adsorbent, both linear and Freundlich models indicated an acceptable fit at a pH of 7.0, where the R2 values ranged from 0.992-0.995.
