Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Both models include the ability to perform topological changes.
For example, in a "default-interventionist" model System 2 processes are not always engaged though they are in "parallel competitive" models (both models include the constant automatic engagement of System 1).
To ensure a clear comparison, as both models include the same 4 dimensions, we replaced the indicator labels from FMF (Table 7) and RMF (Table 4) with MF, AF, SF and RF (Table 8), representing morality-oriented face, ability-oriented face, status-oriented face and social relationship-oriented face.
Similar(57)
Both models included the three breeds and three parity groups, as they were expected to influence the outcome risks.
Thus, we were left as best covariance structure model with either the model including 'sex.family' and 'family (4 VCs)' or the model including 'food.family' and 'family (4 VCs)', both models including the four variance components for the crosses.
Both models included the logarithmic transformation of time, the coefficient(s) associated with the factors under study, and the interaction among them as independent variables.
Results from both models were sensitive to effectiveness assumptions for each vaccine, and both models included the assumption that PPSV23 was ineffective in the prevention of NBPP [ 10, 11].
Both sets of models include the same set of explanatory variables.
These classification statistics are similar because both the national and subnational models include the strongest predictor of diagnosed hypertension – age.
Both models include an agreement for the birth or an agreed birth plan between the woman and an obstetrician or a midwife on the 'fear team', clearly documented in the woman's medical records.
The whole active volume calculations for both models include a potential channel for the substrate uptake, and are thus estimated higher than the active sites alone.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com