Sentence examples for both models fit the from inspiring English sources

Both models fit the experimental data for low bismuth coverages, but only model B fits the data in the whole range of adatom coverage.

Probability F-values (F = 2.45 × 10−08 and F = 9.63 × 10−12 for Sr2+ and UO22+, respectively) and correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.96 for Sr2+ and R2 = 0.98 for UO22+) indicate that both models fit the experimental data well.

Overall, both models fit the observed data very well, and their estimated coefficients are found to be robust to alternative specifications of the predetermined choice-sets for the two spouses.

Both models fit the data better than the null model and the prediction error rate of our model is only 0.19, while that of the null model is 0.5.

According to our estimations both models fit the data.

Both models fit the data well (p-values for model rejection are 0.82 for TEF and 0.86 for GCA).

Both models fitted the data well, as confirmed by the Hosmer and Lemeshow tests that were not significant.

Both models fitted the data better than M0 with values of ℓ = -6603.940 and -6600.818, respectively (Table 2).

Both models fitted the data well, with calendar year explaining 98.3% of the total variation observed in knee arthroplasty incidence for logistic regression and 98.2% for Gompertz regression.

This data is thus consistent with our previous observation that, for sequences of two steps, both models fit well the force induced by the first step but during (and following) the second step predict a force larger than that actually measured in muscle, and the AQLV more so [4].

Both revised SPA models fit the data slightly better than the assessment model (MSE 0.242 0.243 vs 0.257) and were better models based on AICC (Burnham and Anderson 2002).