Sentence examples for both models are in from inspiring English sources

The reaction and heat exchange front velocities calculated with both models are in very good agreement.

The average force coefficients obtained using both models are in good agreement.

The comparative analyses show that the chaos theory model has a slight edge over ARIMA while both models are in principal acceptable.

The proposed constitutive law is then compared against its equivalent models containing interlaminar discontinuity and it is shown that the obtained results from both models are in good.

Results of cointegration for both models are in Table 4. Cointegration result for model no 1 shows that trace statistics and Max Eigen statistics are less than their corresponding 5%% critical values and p value is more than 5%% so we can reject Alternative and can accept null hypothesis that no cointegration exist between bank deposit and economic growth.

As can be seen in Figure 3, the fit of the time courses covered the data, indicating that both models are in principle able to fit the data.

Both models were in a good agreement with the measurements.

In general, predictions of both models were in good agreement with experimental data.

The pressure evolutions predicted by both models were in trend similar to the measured ones for vertical transport of dense gas.

All quality metrics comparing both models were in favour of model 2. The susceptibility to adjustment for readmission increased for longer review periods.

Coefficients, SE and SE/Coefficient ratios for the risk factors introduced in both models are reported in Table 3.