Sentence examples for both model types show from inspiring English sources

The results from both model types show good agreement with the data indicating no influence of hysteresis at the oscillation period examined (T = 348 s).

Flume studies of velocity distributions over each model type showed distinctive differences that may contribute to differential settlement on the models in the absence of predators or sediment.

We have run a series of isotropic inversions of the synthetic data for each of the three model types and show an example of the case for h = 85 km and α = 1.0 (Fig. 4).

Likewise, the rankings of the predictor variables by their relative (nominal) statistical significance in the linear and logistic regression models differed slightly for two samples and between model types (not shown).

The model considered 17 material types, shown in Table 3.

A graphical representation of the paired-ion model type is shown in Figure 3B.

The simulation results from both types of models show that rock failure is more violent when the loading system is softer and the confinement is lower.

Both types of model showed that no AHP dimension was statistically associated with specialty and family residence (Table 4).

The current distribution of genetic model types within the Animal Models module is shown in Figure 4.

Here we will discuss four different modified models: the Hubbert model, the generalized Weng model, the H C Z model and the Weibull model, showing different types of bell-shaped transformation.

As Fig.  5 shows, the agreement across model types is quite low; as expected, the un-normalized read count data was the least consistent across models, averaging only 4.3%% agreement in differentially expressed genes.