Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
In a direct comparison of FISH and qPCR for the quantification of cells in nitrifying biofilms Kindaichi et al. ([2006]) found that both methods yielded comparable results but qPCR was more favorable due to higher sensitivity and faster handling.
Both methods yielded comparable results (479 and 498 neurons, respectively, i.e., a 3.8% underestimation due to the slicing artifact).
When comparing DEA to SFA, however, Linna [ 84] and Webster et al. [ 85] found that both methods yielded comparable results when measuring hospital efficiency.
While both methods yielded comparable estimates of homologous recombination rates, the diversity in this H. parasuis population is greater than is usually included in the analysis using gubbins and so care should be taken when interpreting the results.
Similar(56)
Because both transformed and untransformed analytical methods yielded comparable conclusions, we present the analysis based on the untransformed data for better comparison with other studies.
The three methods yielded comparable AUC values of 0.682, 0.667, and 0.621, respectively.
Distribution and anchor-based methods yielded comparable results in identifying MCIDs.
The analysis of simulated fGn and fBm time series shows that all the considered methods yield comparable H values when properly applied.
The results are also compared with those of earlier works employing non-direct methods to estimate ε and show that some of these methods yield comparable values, although the spread of the some of the data previously reported is significant.
It remains unclear whether the AHP method and established decision making methods yield comparable results.
The study tested whether these methods yield comparable health-state values.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com