Sentence examples for both methods were then from inspiring English sources

Both methods were then critically evaluated from the analytical and operational points of view.

The findings from both methods were then fed into SPSS (17.0) to perform logistic regression analyses to ensure statistical significance.

Both methods were then applied to the REPEATS Shah data set, filtered for decreasing levels of sequence identity w.r.t. the training set.

Results from both methods were then pooled and exon expression plots of genes that were detected as DAS in at least two separate experiments were visually inspected to identify false positive results.

Semistructured interviews (qualitative) and task diaries (quantitative) were used to triangulate and develop valuation of CHW tasks; both methods were then used to develop and initiate clinic modeling, the second quantitative component [ 31].

The ROC characteristics of both methods were then validated in an independent database of 324 patients enrolled in European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase I trials of cytotoxic agents between 2000 and 2009.

The models produced by both methods are then implemented in Model Predictive Control (MPC) configurations, suitable for constrained DPSs.

Untagged PfSENP1 from both methods was then buffer-exchanged into gel filtration buffer (50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 8.0).

The relevant information from both methods was then combined and discrepancies examined.

cDNA from both methods was then end repaired, A tailed, and standard Illumina adapters were ligated on.

Summary score statistics for both methods are then described through box-plot and contrasted with the complete case (CC) analysis and the true score (TS).