Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(4)
The concentrations obtained with both methods were statistically compared.
Both methods were statistically correlated using a 25-run, five-factor multiple-level d-optimal mixture design.
Modelled maximum power and annual energy values obtained through both methods were statistically compared to the experimental ones.
The DO2 obtained from both methods were statistically different (P < 0.05) at 12 and 22 °C but not at 4 °C.
Similar(56)
The difference between both methods was statistically significant (p < 0.001; kappa = 0.194).
To identify whether the difference in r values of both methods was statistically significant, Steiger's test was used (Steiger 1980).
Deer density estimates by the four methods were statistically similar at all effort levels simulated.
The results of the LC-UV and LC-CAD methods were statistically compared through ANOVA and showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).
The two methods were statistically compared using the Student's t test, at 95% confidence level, resulting in no significant difference.
The differences between the two methods were statistically significant at baseline (p = 0.02).
The results of the proposed methods were statistically compared with those obtained using the reference method [11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com