Sentence examples for both methods were shown from inspiring English sources

Both methods were shown to provide slightly better predictions than FBA.

Both methods were shown to be comparable in terms of POPF rate, mortality, overall morbidity, and hospital stay.

The size analysis of nanoparticles prepared by both methods is shown in Fig. 3.

Both methods are shown to have a positive effect on the overall performance and habitability.

The template set used for this test is shown in Fig. 13 and the resulting mapping and pagination for both methods is shown in Fig. 14.

Both methods are shown to be capable of providing detailed information on the structure and flow within packed beds, with predictions being in reasonable agreement with available data.

Scalability of both methods is shown up to 8192 CPU cores, with near ideal scaling for DG up to 32,768 cores.

Both methods are shown to provide adequate accuracy far beyond the expected applicability range of the asymptotic approach (which requires both excitation intensity and losses to be small), with direct energy balance being generally superior.

However, the assessment results from both methods are shown to be strongly dependent on the Weibull exponent which determination requires a certain level of expertise in the field of fracture mechanics.

Both methods are shown to be effective tools in calculating the dimensions of the brace necessary for achieving a desired fundamental natural frequency and one of its higher partials.

Both methods are shown to be efficient in the estimation of the stability and instability regions with high accuracy and high confidence levels and at lower cost compared with the classic Monte Carlo based method.