Sentence examples for both methods were measured from inspiring English sources

The interobserver accuracy and the agreement between both methods were measured by the coefficient of intraclass correlation (CIC) and a Bland-Altman plotting (BAP).

The speed and accuracy of both methods were measured in one study [ 35], as was effectiveness [ 33] in another.

Although the light distortion and CSF recovered to baseline values, the lack of correlation after 15 days between light distortion and CSF might confirm that both methods are measuring different aspects of visual quality.

The volumes of formed cylindrical spur gear calculated by above three methods were measured with Archimedes drainage method.

The performance and cost of each of the methods were measured in a 9228-ha test area.

Description: The prediction accuracies of all tested methods were measured using the structure benchmark set.

To assess network integrity, average betweenness and characteristic path length (see Methods) were measured.

Accuracy of these methods was measured using an F1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall).

The performance of different methods is measured in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of classifier.

The running time and CPU time of these methods are measured by LSF.

The association between the two methods was measured by the product moment correlation coefficient.