Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
Only SNPs called by both methods were considered for the analysis.
Those not confirmed by both methods were considered indeterminate.
Only sites detected using both methods were considered positively selected.
To limit false positives, only sites detected using both methods were considered as positive selection targets.
Deletions and insertions of at least 100 bp in size and detected by both methods were considered for further analysis.
The genes identified by both methods were considered as potential target genes regulated by a given miRNA.
Similar(46)
Performances of both methods are considered.
Different ways of interpreting the results for both methods are considered and illustrated by examples.
In this paper, both methods are considered.
Based on current available data may both methods be considered to produce plausible estimates of vegetation productivity for Africa.
Nonetheless, we recommend that, until the presented issues are directly addressed, both methods be considered as part of an analysis pipeline.
More suggestions(17)
both devices were considered
both methods were explored
both methods were in
both methods were subjected
both classes were considered
both soldiers were considered
both neurons were considered
both models were considered
both panels were considered
both tests were considered
both stores were considered
both replicates were considered
both clubs were considered
both mice were considered
both works were considered
both designers were considered
both methods were chosen
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com