In our experiments, we compare both methods; in particular, we test the behavior in regions where crossing fiber populations are present.
Out of the 635,712 possible patterns we tested, both methods call 635,483 insignificant, both call 49 positive, and they disagree on 180. Figure 8D plots the number of significant hits identified relative to dinucleotide scrambled sequences using shuffled (blue) and non-shuffled (red) non-ChIPed motifs.
For the case of the Bondarenko et al. model, we tested both methods, Euler and RL, and both demanded the same time step, Δ t o = 0.0001 ms due to stability issues.
We tested both methods for a number of molecules between 52 and 100 and observed that then USC finds more hits for an increasing number of proteins.
To do so, we tested both methods by assessing Q-Q Plots generated for disease-based comparisons.
We tested both methods with respect to the number and accuracy of prior known interactions (PKIs), and the effect of the weight of the PKIs.
We tested both methods on raw plant material; the "fast" by quenching the tissue in liquid nitrogen with process completion within max. 5 s and the "slow" by freezing at 2°C/min rate and obtained results are summarised in Table 1.
Because some previous studies (24,25) used an intravenous route of MSC administration, yet others (23) used intratracheal delivery, we tested both methods of administration of MSCs, aiming at either prevention or repair of lung injury.
To do this, we tested both our method and the StochKit implementation of the ODM against simple systems composed of "chains" of (bio chemical reactions, i.e., series of reactions in which the product of a given reaction becomes the reactant of the following.
