Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
No correlation nor concordance between both methods was observed.
No correlation between both methods was observed (r = 0.170, p = 0.20).
On average a difference of 1.8 log units between both methods was observed for the predicted log Kaw values.
The main difference between both methods was observed in the dispersion of the mechanical response of the asphalt course.
Overall, for both sets of reference, the difference between the number of approved images, using both methods, was observed not to exceed 13% (four images) for any α value.
Good agreement between both methods was observed although the levels for free chlorine measured by the optical sensor are systematically lower than the readings obtained from the DPD method.
Similar(53)
The ductility values determined from both methods are observed to increase from approximately 10 80% when the testing temperature increases from room temperature to 1200 °C.
No significant differences of the fluorescent intensities of the different analytes between both methods were observed (Figure 4).
Majority of the fluctuation (>85%) in S. mansoni test results by both methods were observed in children with light intensity of infection.
A good correlation between both measures methods was observed for PTP and WOB (R = 0,91 and 0,87; respectively).
The quantifications were also conducted by HPLC as a comparator and a good correlation between both analytical methods was observed, thus validating the spectrometric method (see the Supporting Information for detailed UV/Vis absorbance data and HPLC chromatograms).
More suggestions(16)
both cylinders was observed
both systems was observed
both contexts was observed
both regions was observed
both methods was proved
both pesticides was observed
both probes was observed
both outcomes was observed
both methods was conducted
both methods was performed
both methods was calculated
both directions was observed
both genders was observed
both centres was observed
both variables was observed
both activities was observed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com