Sentence examples for both methods was estimated from inspiring English sources
Error in divergence times for both methods was estimated based on the distribution of 100 bootstrap replicate datasets, following the recommendations in the r8s documentation.
Bootstrap support values for both methods were estimated using 100 pseudo-replicates.
The percentage repellency of each candidate plant by both application methods was estimated from the catches of mosquitoes in the treatment and control houses.
The sensitivity of the methods was estimated by analyzing the reference DNA fragment containing 5hmC provided by the kit.
The accuracy of indirect methods was estimated by correlation analysis between direct ratios and reconstructed ratios.
After correcting for incomplete reporting, avoidable waste due to inadequate methods was estimated at 42% (95% CI 36%to49%9%).
Variance components for both BLUP methods were estimated with ASREML [ 19] and the model solutions yielded estimated breeding values.
Variance components for both BLUP methods were estimated with ASREML [ 16] and the model solutions yielded estimated breeding values.
The values of behavioral parameters both for the right and the left entry lane with two different methods were estimated.
Uncertainties in AGD (using Dance or Wu methods) were estimated considering an overall 20% error [18].
