Sentence examples for both methods was also from inspiring English sources
The estimation variance calculated with both methods was also considered to access the uncertainty of the predictions.
Evaluation of stable and progressive disease by both methods was also done.
In a study comparing resistance measurements obtained from foot-to-foot BIA with those from underwater weighing and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, a strong correlation (r = 0.89) with both methods was also reported [ 41].
Numerical illustrations for both methods are also presented.
Finally, methodologies employing rational design, combinatorial selection, or both methods are also discussed.
Both methods were also used to track single molecules of neurexin, a synaptic adhesion protein, to measure its lateral diffusion in the presence of neuroligin, its trans-synaptic adhesion partner.
The effects of time-aged soil on the extraction of analytes were examined and the results obtained by both methods were also compared.
Both methods are also able to follow CRLB closely for around sample length N > 60.
Also, it was noted that the time taken to fingerprint the library of songs for both methods were also taken.
In Section 3, RCMC error comparison between one-step and two-step MOCO is discussed, and computational burden of both methods is also analyzed in detail.
However, significant differences between both methods were also observed.
