Sentence examples for both methods use the from inspiring English sources

Both methods use the criteria of principal angles between subspaces spanned between the previous and current prolongation operators.

Since both methods use the same initial reconstruction, any difference is solely coming from different underlying mechanism in their flux evaluation.

Although both methods use the reduction of resident hand flora as a quantitative parameter for antimicrobial efficacy, there are major differences concerning the test design.

Figure 5 shows that the proposed technique outperforms data-aided channel estimation when both methods use the same extra amount of energy for channel estimation.

Both methods use the SIFT, Color, and Gabor descriptors, but here we used a combination of hue and opponent angle as the color descriptor and tested with a 1000 center codebook not a 100 center one.

Both methods use the same underlying ODE model of regulation (see Section 2), but use different model selection approaches.

We then correlated our measurements with both methods using the UNIQUAC free volume model and compared them with available published data for isotherms 313.15 K and 333.15 K.

Regarding position and velocity estimations, the proposed method returned errors that were almost same as those returned by the other methods, which makes sense because both methods used the same information.

To compare the respective analysis approaches both methods used the same original CEL files resulting from the Affymetrix Chip reader.

We found little overlap between our prediction sets, despite both methods using the same PECAN alignments as input.

Both methods used, the conventional plate count and the unconventional luminometry, require scraping bacterial biofilm.