Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Test both methods to see what works and identify any potential problems.
Try out both methods to see which one feels more precise.[10].[10]
An alternative to this is to mix the chocolate mixture with the bubble bath just prior to adding to the bath.[1] You might like to try both methods to see which works best for your needs.
Similar(57)
It was also possible to monitor the activity of identified neurons before and after the application of receptor blockers in both preparations (see Methods) and to see that the modulation of the interactions among neurons affected the dynamics of single neurons.
Considering females, we found similar results to males only in childhood, although for girls both methods were seen to be slightly more accurate.
We present an example where an individual's morning particulate sampling data were plotted over their location classification categories according to both methods, see Figure 2A.
Either way, both methods see the smugglers try to squeeze every last drop of profit from their clients.
Furthermore, both methods can be seen to be doing better in the 1 1 than in the 1 3 panels, showing that the relative proportions of insertions and deletions matter in determining the accuracy.
For comparison of banding patterns between both methods, see pics.
For an introduction to MCMC methods, see [89].
The level of difficulty for both tasks converged to 75% using a staircase method (see Methods).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com