Sentence examples for both methods there is from inspiring English sources

To compare both methods there is the need to define how the Structured algorithm was performed.

It is evident that in both methods, there is an excellent correlation between the analytical parameter and the concentration of the drug.

Out of 1884 samples genotyped by both methods there were 11 discordant calls (0.58%, Supplementary File S1).

The different methods of analysis were able to assign a genotype for slightly different sets of BACs (Table 2) but for BACs that were assigned genotypes with both methods there was 100% agreement of the genotyping calls made by the different approaches.

Despite Doležel et al. (1998) having shown a close agreement between both methods, there are numerous cases in the literature where estimates obtained using both techniques do not correspond.

Results With both methods there was a highly significant association between the level of predicted risk and the incidence of cardiovascular events and of total deaths: up to three quarters of all cardiovascular events and two thirds of all deaths were reported among people classified as at high or very high risk with either method.

In both methods there was a large reduction in the total number of genes reported in each list, in terms of the consensus between the A and B groups, the agreement dropped to 7.5% following mean-centring, but increased to 74.1% after correction by ComBat (Table 1 and Additional File 3).

Considering these positive and negative aspects of both of these diagnostic methods, there is now the argument that real-time PCR should become the gold standard instead of faecal culture, as over more recent years, various studies have shown better sensitivity and specificity for real-time PCR compared to bacterial culture [ 22].

For both passive and active learning methods, there is a need to estimate the size of the annotated sample required to reach a performance target.

With all these methods, there is no excuse for not knowing your market.

For both scoring methods, there was generally more paroxysmal AF and less persistent or long-standing persistent AF at lower scores, compared with higher scores.