Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
The results obtained from both methods show that long-range internal stresses of the same type exist in the cell as well as in the subgrain structures.
Both methods show that group I has experienced substitution saturation, but groups II and III have experienced little substitution saturation (Additional file 12).
The full-field deformation and strain maps obtained by both methods show that the actuator looses its original parallelepipedic shape.
Our calculations of the photonic band structure, by both methods, show that the approximate calculation works very well for the 5CB NLC cylinders in a silicon oxide (silica) host.
Both methods show that with the increase of volume percent of nanotubes the Poisson's ratio is decreasing until it gets almost unaltered, but the rate of decrease in the Poisson's ratio which is provided by FE method is greater than the Micromechanical method.
Atomistic kinetic Monte Carlo simulations performed at T = 300 K and additional analysis based on the activation energies obtained by both methods show that they are in good qualitative agreement, despite some important quantitative discrepancies due to the large absolute errors found near the dislocation cores.
Similar(48)
Both methods showed that Tv6 induces a clear accumulation of autophagosomes.
Both methods showed that mTHPC kinetics were different for liver and tumour tissue.
Results of the two assays were 100% consistent, and both methods showed that 12 of the examined samples were positive, while 33 were negative.
Both methods showed that Ki-67 provided additional prognostic information beyond that available from Gleason score and PSA: for the semi-quantitative method, Δ χ (1 d.f).=24.6 (P<0.0001), overall survival χ=20.5 (P<0.0001), and for the quantitative method, Δ χ (1 d.f).=15.1 (P=0.0001), overall survival χ=10.85 P=0.0011).
Both of these methods show that sample 4 was the most divergent, relative to the other 4 samples.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com