Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
When the protein concentration in the lung was high, the s-Cath method is a better method for estimating protein concentration; in contrast, as inflammation increases, both methods provide similar estimates of the percentage of neutrophils in the air spaces of the lung.
Although differences exist, both methods provide similar interpretations of the data.
Both methods provide similar evidence that the FecL gene affects both the mean and the variability of litter size.
Compared with PET examinations, IU quantification in DECT is fast and low cost, so it would be worth performing a prospective study to correlate FDG and IU and investigate if both methods provide similar information about tumor metabolism.
Though we showed that both methods provide similar information on physical activity levels, behavioural mapping is not a perfect gold standard as a comparator method, since it has a low sampling rate.
In a direct comparison with high-throughput mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq), both methods provide similar assessments of relative transcript abundance, but DGE better detects expression differences for poorly expressed genes and does not exhibit transcript length bias [ 24].
Similar(54)
Both methods provided similar results for the majority of the landscape units studied.
The results of a case study demonstrated that both methods provided similar results which corresponded with the lake's actual trophic state.
As inflammation increased, both methods provided similar estimates of neutrophil percentages in the lung.
In a comparison between GC/HR-EI-MS and GC/LR-ECNI-MS, Thomsen et al. [ 49] found that both methods provided similar LOD and repeatability.
When the protein concentration in the lung was high, the s-Cath was a more sensitive method; by contrast, as inflammation increased, both methods provided similar estimates of neutrophil percentages in the lung.
More suggestions(19)
both approaches provide similar
both methods provide consistent
both methods provided similar
both applications provide similar
both studies provide similar
both methods provide insufficient
both methods provide unique
both methods provide relevant
both rubrics provide similar
both models provide similar
both methods provide reproducible
both methods provide quantitative
both methods provide good
both genes provide similar
both parameters provide similar
both tests provide similar
both presentations provide similar
both methods provide strong
both examinations provide similar
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com