Sentence examples for both methods may be from inspiring English sources

The results are compared for cases in which both methods may be used.

Positive and negative differences between both methods may be balanced, resulting in a small mean difference.

Given the advantages and drawbacks of each procedure, the choice of methodology should be determined in accordance with the study design, and complementary use of both methods may be considered.

Differences encountered using both methods may be due to limitations of the data.

Both methods may be useful for diagnosis of early trauma coagulopathies, specifically hypocoagulability, hypercoagulability, hyperfibrinolysis, and platelet dysfunction.

Hence, it has been suggested that the use of both methods may be more informative than only using a single method [ 19, 20].

Interpolation of two windows considering features of the both method may be another research direction.

Maps presenting indicative results on under/over estimation of ETo by both temperature methods may be useful for their more accurate application over different Mediterranean climates.

The lack of influence of the distance between markers and the number of linkage groups on the estimation of effects of additive-by-additive epistasis interaction genes by the two methods shows that both these methods may be used for different genetic maps and for different plant species.

Those miRNAs that show accessibility to the target site by both folding methods may be assumed to have higher probability of being effective in down regulation of the target proteins as the secondary structure of RNA is a dynamic one in a live cell.

Other research including that from Eisenberg (2001) and the World Health Organization (2000) also suggest many CAM users seek these therapies when allopathic medical treatment is ineffective or undesirable and when a combination of both treatment methods may be superior to only one [ 10, 28- 30].