Sentence examples for both methods is that from inspiring English sources

The broad effect of both methods is that lending to other banks will require more than twice as much capital as now.

It is worth mentioning that an important difference between both methods is that ReLA provides more precise results, as the regions predicted are shorter (up to 750 nt long, with an average of 485 nt) than those coming from EEL (up to 11563 nt, with an average of 2644 nt).

An important difference between both methods is that the SeptiFast® approach was designed as a multiplex PCR reaction.

A significant limitation of both methods is that a precise measurement of the deviation in degrees compared to radiological measurements is not possible.

One possible explanation for the high variances in the performances of both methods is that the number of samples in the hepatitis data set is not big enough to learn a stable model with respect to the number of attributes.

The main difference between both ranking methods is that SVMRank takes into account all ranks, whereas StructRank focuses on the topmost ranks.

The common concept of both alternative methods is that abundantly present transcripts will more easily find a complementary sequence, whereas rare transcripts have a much higher probability of remaining ss.

The advantage of both these methods is that analysis of individual cells is made allowing population dynamics to be discovered.

An inherent difference between both types of methods is that, simultaneous methods compute motions for vehicles all at once, while joint methods divide the original problem into parts and combine them together.

However, the problem of both the methods is that each gene set or sub-network identified includes too many genes (∼tens of genes each), which greatly limits their clinical application.

The most significant result of both sampling methods is that the conductivity (µS cm−1) increases with rising saturation levels.