Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The presented comparison of both methods is based on both dc and ac simulated conductivity data.
Furthermore, we found that HIC with ammonium tartrate in the mobile phase is orthogonal to RPC, despite the fact that retention via both methods is based on hydrophobicity.
The observed discrepancy between the unigene set outcomes from both methods is based on the different algorithms used by each program.
Similar(57)
Both methods are based on spectral matrix structure.
Both methods are based on signal detection theory.
Both methods are based on conventional sifting followed by a posterior adjustment.
Both methods are based on the numerical solution of governing equations using a finite volume method.
Both methods are based on vectorization in Matlab and the slow for-loops are thus avoided.
Both methods are based on an interesting relation in Boolean functions, identified as mapping.
Both methods are based on the same lumped hydrological model that is calibrated beforehand.
Both methods are based on imposing a temperature gradient on a suspended particle.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com