Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Both methods give different effects, with normally the lowest supercooling but higher risk of protein damage due to phase separation for the "slow" cooling method [ 38].
Similar(59)
The two methods give different results.
In order to assess the relative merits of these methods, I repeated the experiments of Section 4 for both methods and compared the resulting maximum absolute and relative force errors incurred for the same cell → cell interactions (for which the two methods give different θ).
As expected, the different methods give different responses, depending on the specific assay reaction.
In addition, these methods give different distances among categories within a variable.
Are there specific reasons why some methods give different results than others?
The phylogeny with bootstrap support and posterior probability values, as well as indication of the nodes where the methods give different resolution, is given in Figure 3.
Although the methods give different CI results for a given cellulose, the order of crystallinity for these celluloses is relatively consistent within each measurement technique.
So, not only do the two methods give different allelic ratio estimates, but they also produce gene pools that are only 66% similar for allelic ratios ≥2.
The two methods give different results for the same data and could lead to conflicting conclusions, unless investigators are aware of the differences between the estimators.
If all genome-phylogeny methods tend to return the same answers, then it probably does not matter which one is used; however, if on the other hand, different methods give different results, the choice of method becomes important.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com