Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Both methods do not require an explicit plant model.
Both methods do not involve human participation.
Both methods do not compromise the BER of the modulation scheme used since it keeps the same.
Both methods do not correlate the reflected signal with a clean replica signal, but directly cross-correlate the line-of-sight signal received from a zenith-looking antenna either with the reflected signal from a nadir-looking antenna for the first method or with a modelled replica of the encrypted signal obtained in a semi-codeless way for the second method.
Both methods do not adequately account for the observed distribution of outliers (exemplified in LC-A and LC-B).
This can easily be understood as both methods do not use the maximum (or peak) voxel value.
Similar(48)
If both methods don't work, ask to go to the bathroom.
Furthermore, both methods did not identify the same locations for the anomalous maximum.
Polytomies were introduced when both methods did not agree.
Exclusion of underreporters using both methods did not materially change the results.
The number of microvessels as such, counted by both methods, did not differ significantly between fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors.
More suggestions(18)
both processes do not
both measures do not
both steps do not
both procedures do not
both parents do not
both ionomers do not
both components do not
both methods need not
both companies do not
both techniques do not
both mutants do not
both assumptions do not
both factors do not
both doctors do not
both cores do not
both skis do not
both metrics do not
both sides do not
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com