Sentence examples for both methods are the from inspiring English sources

Both methods are the current Chinese standard for nitrate determination.

Common control parameters to both methods are the merger settings rms = 2.8 px and δms = 2%.

The main advantage of both methods is the maintenance of sharp profiles during dynamic simulations.

The reactivity ratio values calculated from both methods were the same.

However, the preference order of the top criteria with both methods was the same and weights were similar.

Therefore, the iterate (x_{m} = [s_{m},t_{m} ]^{t}) gained by both methods is the exact solution of the correction Eq. (10).■.■

The common purpose of both methods is the optimization of the net power output for heat source temperatures lower and higher than the reference plant.

The mechanism of action of both methods is the creation of aqueous pathways in the stratum corneum leading to increased skin permeability.

Common to both methods is the assessment of change in mean or average values over time.

Central to both methods is the goal of optimizing study power when there is significant inter-study heterogeneity.

Proximal and distal segments of the sural nerves from both sides showed no differences with both methods, being the nerves longitudinally symmetric.