Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
The results provided by both methods are not statistically different.
However, the EO process is complex and residual gas is toxic for tissue and cells whereas radioactive source is difficult to access for GI and therefore both methods are not practical for dental offices and laboratories.
Both methods are not exactly straightforward, so, if celestial mechanics is a new subject for you, I would suggest to start deriving the solution for the orbital elements of a simpler problem, the so-called two-body problem (i.e., like the case of the Earth orbiting the Sun, without anyother planets).
Both methods are not efficient and go against the basic rights of citizens".
Thus, in scenarios with lack of signal information both methods are not applicable anymore.
And both methods are not able to adapt to the orientation or the shape of the object.
Similar(49)
First, despite the mean difference between both methods was not statistically significant, the limits of agreement were wide.
Efficiency of microglial recovery with both methods was not different.
However, the costs of both methods were not compared.
The mean differences of both methods were not clinically significant and no systematic errors were observed.
In zone Z, the ROC-AUC of both methods was 0.5, indicating that both methods were not informative.
More suggestions(15)
both terms are not
both modes are not
both processes are not
both characteristics are not
both people are not
both atoms are not
both ideas are not
both methods need not
both startups are not
both producers are not
both kernels are not
both questionnaires are not
both requirements are not
both concepts are not
both sources are not
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com