Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
If both methods are equivalent then  12 =0.5.
From this result, we can see that the noise reduction performances of both methods are equivalent when the input signal is Gaussian.
If f is a strictly convex quadratic function, the both methods are equivalent in the case that an exact line search is used.
From the observation of Figures 6 and 7 we can conclude that both methods are equivalent when estimating the central frequency.
If, as in most practical examples, the open-loop system already has this structure, and the damping is not pervasive, both methods are equivalent.
It is shown that in presence of calibration errors and large additive noise the STFD-based method has better performance than the SOS-based method, and that in presence of weak noise both methods are equivalent in their performance.
Similar(50)
Both methods were equivalent with regards to the gold standard, but the semiautomatic method was more accurate.
The detection limit of both methods was equivalent and corresponds to 1 amol of biotinylated DNA attached on an array.
Both methods were equivalent in 81% of patients, and CTAP showed more lesions in another 11%.
To quantify under which circumstances is diagonal and thus when the methods are equivalent, we will analyze the properties of, which figures in both estimators.
It is shown that these methods are equivalent to each other on certain premises.
More suggestions(19)
both approaches are equivalent
both methods are comparable
both methods are valid
both methods are soil-free
both methods are hard
both methods are valuable
both methods are straightforward
both methods are robust
both methods are suboptimal
both methods are applicable
both methods are easy
both methods are simple
both methods are correlated
both methods exhibit equivalent
both formulations are equivalent
both techniques are equivalent
both diets are equivalent
both alternatives are equivalent
both submodules are equivalent
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com