Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
It is concluded that both methods are effective to analyze the thermal performance in the TACR calandria.
While both methods are effective, Staudinger ligation is better suited for enriching the cross-linked peptides since there are fewer issues with sample handling.
Using 447,357 individual donation records across 8 years from a large Chinese blood bank, we show that both methods are effective in addressing blood shortage in the short run but have different implications for total blood supply in the long run.
Although both methods are effective [ 3, 30], both have disadvantages.
Both methods are effective and the choice depends on the availability of equipment within a given laboratory.
Both methods are effective, but the costs are substantial and it takes a relatively long time for the screening.
Similar(53)
Both methods were effective in the production of mesoporous zeolites; however, MW was more efficient than CE as it led to well-defined mesopores with relatively small sizes and a narrow size distribution within a short treatment time.
Both methods were effective in delaying Gal4-driven transgene activation.
We demonstrated that both methods were effective in reducing the increased orbital volume due to the fracture.
Simulation results demonstrate that both the methods are effective ways to mitigate blind velocities in DDMA MIMO GMTI radar systems.
Limited available data suggested both of these methods are effective beyond that time.
More suggestions(16)
both methods are robust
both peptides are effective
both programmes are effective
both methods are costly
both agents are effective
both techniques are effective
both treatments are effective
both designs are effective
both offenses are effective
both therapies are effective
both methods are correlated
both tools are effective
both methods are cumbersome
both systems are effective
both controllers are effective
both fibres are effective
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com