Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Both methods are easy to understand and compute.
Both methods are easy to handle, simple, rapid and quantitative, and eliminate undesired quantification of subtelomeric sequences as it is the case for the TRF analysis.
Similar(58)
Both EQ5D methods are easy and rapid generic instruments, well validated and found to be reliable in different cultures and in different diseases including a new validation study in patients after myocardial infarction [ 19, 20].
The problem is that none of the methods are easy, cheap and practical.
Which methods are easy to use and give reliable results?
These methods are easy to apply, have good stability properties, and lead to highly accurate solutions.
Fortunately, my methods are easy to master and I like training people as much as I like teaching their dogs.
These methods are easy to implement and interpret.
Nissl methods are easy applicable and widely accepted for evaluation of the infarct volume [36].
Size-exclusion methods are easy to automate and very suitable for implementation in screening assays.
These methods are easy to implement but have certain disadvantages, especially for quantitative transport studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com