Sentence examples for both methods are displayed from inspiring English sources
Two liquid chromatograms that compare the peptide quality resulting from both methods are displayed in Figure 2.
The cumulative distribution functions of the multicast rate achieved by above three methods are displayed in Figure8.
Raman spectra of the films produced by the N2-reactive and the co-sputtering methods are displayed with empty and full symbols, respectively.
XRD curves of thin films produced by the N2-reactive and the co-sputtering methods are displayed in black and gray, respectively.
Additional results based on the alternative approaches described in the methods are displayed in the Supplemental Online Material (Supplement Tables S6 S12).
These values were 56%, 99%, 95% and 93% for reader 2. The diagnostic predictive values for the three reading methods are displayed in Table 2.
In Figure 2, multiple testing corrected significance thresholds, estimated by several different methods, are displayed for genomic regions of varying sizes up to 2,000 adjacent windows.
From the one EDS given in Table S1 of the Supporting Information, both MEM and SKQ were applied as described earlier, and the estimation results for the two methods are displayed in Figure 4.
